Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAshford, Nicholas A.
dc.date.accessioned2008-05-28T17:11:57Z
dc.date.available2008-05-28T17:11:57Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/41850
dc.description.abstractThis article challenges certain tenets of the theories of reflexive law and ecological modernization. While far-sighted prevention-oriented and structural changes are needed, some proponents of these theories argue that the very industries and firms that create environmental problems can, through continuous institutional learning; the application of life cycle analysis; dialogue and networks with stakeholders; and implementation of "environmental management systems," be transformed into sustainable industries and firms. While useful, these reforms are insufficient. It is not marginal or incremental changes that are needed for sustainability, but rather major product, process, and system transformations – often beyond the capacity of the dominant industries and firms. This article also questions the alleged failure of regulation to stimulate needed technological changes, and identifies the conditions under which innovation for sustainability can occur. Finally, it discusses differences in needed policies for industrialized and developing countries.en
dc.subjectecological modernizationen
dc.subjectreflexive lawen
dc.subjecttechnological innovationen
dc.subjectenvironmental regulationen
dc.subjectvoluntary agreementsen
dc.subjectnegotiationen
dc.titleGovernment and Environmental Innovation in Europe and North Americaen
dc.typeArticleen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Technology and Law Program
    Research and graduate studies bring law and technology perspectives to environmental, policy, trade, and sustainability issues

Show simple item record