Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorPeter P. Belobaba.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTsoukalas, Gerassimosen_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Aeronautics and Astronautics.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2008-09-03T14:52:01Z
dc.date.available2008-09-03T14:52:01Z
dc.date.copyright2007en_US
dc.date.issued2007en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/42197
dc.descriptionThesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2007.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 201).en_US
dc.description.abstractThe last decade has been a period of fundamental transformations for the US airline industry and has caused many carriers to make significant changes in their operational strategies. The traditional US network or "Legacy" carriers have had to deal with many new challenges including the devastating effects of 9/11, increased competition from low-cost airlines and increased volatility in fuel prices, to name a few. These setbacks have pushed many carriers into a financial crisis. In fact, four out of the six major airlines in the United States filed for bankruptcy protection between 2001 and 2005. In the midst of this crisis, these traditional carriers have had to concentrate on reducing their unit costs and improving their productivity levels in order to survive. The goal of the thesis is to examine to what extent these changes have led to a convergence in terms of unit costs and productivity levels between the Legacy carriers and their low-cost counterparts. Specifically we analyze and break down unit costs and productivity measures into their underlying components in order to identify what is driving change in the industry. We compare the different results at various levels of detail, including aggregate industry group trends, individual airline results and fleet-level based results comparing wide-body to narrow-body aircraft. We find that there are both qualitative and quantitative signs of convergence in several different categories in which LCCs have traditionally held a competitive advantage. These include unit costs excluding fuel and transport-related expenses, labor unit costs and employee wage productivity. On the Legacy side, the key forces driving improved efficiency have been dramatic labors cuts and higher stage lengths.en_US
dc.description.abstract(cont.) The former has been achieved by utilizing the bankruptcy while the latter results from the shifting of capacity towards international markets. On the LCC side we find that a significant increase in labor wages resulting from increased staff seniority has been the main source of losses in certain productivity results. Despite these signs of convergence, our fleet-level based analysis also showed that LCCs still retain a significant competitive advantage when isolating narrow-body fleets which are usually flown in the domestic US markets.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Gerassimos Tsoukalas.en_US
dc.format.extent201 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectAeronautics and Astronautics.en_US
dc.titleConvergence in the US airline industry : a unit cost and productivity analysisen_US
dc.title.alternativeConvergence in the United States airline industry : a unit cost and productivity analysisen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics
dc.identifier.oclc230816318en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record