Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorThomas J. Allen.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKim, David J. (David Jinwoo)en_US
dc.contributor.otherSystem Design and Management Program.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-03-16T19:30:18Z
dc.date.available2009-03-16T19:30:18Z
dc.date.copyright2008en_US
dc.date.issued2008en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/44693
dc.descriptionThesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, System Design and Management Program, 2008.en_US
dc.descriptionMIT Barker Engineering and Dewey Library copies: Printed in pages.en_US
dc.descriptionIssued also printed in pages.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (leaves 137-139).en_US
dc.description.abstractThere is much enthusiastic debate on the topic of generation gaps in the workplace today; what the generational differences are, how to address the apparent challenges, and if the generations themselves are even real. Despite the frenzy, however, there has been relatively limited empirical research performed on this issue; in particular, no empirical research in the context of an engineering organization seems to have been performed. With that in mind, the main intent of the thesis is to determine the existence of generational differences among engineers in a large, technical organization, and discuss the potential implications of the findings. Extensive literature research and analysis identified communication techniques, leadership preferences, learning styles, and work motivation to be the key hypothesized differences most pertinent to an engineering organization. A questionnaire was put together based on these differences and distributed to a sample that consisted of approximately eighty members from each of the four generations: Traditionalists, Baby Boomers, Generation Xers, Millennials. In general, data analysis revealed that engineers do not exhibit generation gaps to the same extent as described in the literature. In fact, much of the data suggested contrary views, most notable of which was the importance of face-to-face communication, especially amongst the younger engineers. Knowledge transfer across generations remains a challenge, however, and possible approaches to addressing this issue are through physical accommodations, extensive mentorship programs, and salient investments in Information Technology (IT).en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby David J. Kim.en_US
dc.format.extent139 leavesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectSystem Design and Management Program.en_US
dc.titleGeneration gaps in engineering?en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentSystem Design and Management Program.en_US
dc.identifier.oclc297178441en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record