Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorDuane Boning and Roy E. Welsch.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPulitzer, Seward Webb, 1974-en_US
dc.contributor.otherLeaders for Manufacturing Program.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-03-16T19:36:52Z
dc.date.available2009-03-16T19:36:52Z
dc.date.copyright2008en_US
dc.date.issued2008en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/44742
dc.descriptionThesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science; and, (M.B.A.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management; in conjunction with the Leaders for Manufacturing Program at MIT, 2008.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 119-120).en_US
dc.description.abstractCorporate research and development (R&D) drives progress in the high-tech industries. Companies that advance the state-of-the-art in product performance enjoy significant advantages over the competition. However, although technical achievement may be required for competitiveness, it is far from sufficient. The successful creation of a prototype is in no way an indication that large quantities of identical units can be economically or reliably produced. Indeed, transitioning a new technology from the laboratory in which it was created to a production environment can be as challenging as the actual development. Many of the obstacles on the path to production stem from process variability. The randomness inherent in every manufacturing operation introduces risk into the transition process. As products increasingly become more technologically complex, the need for close coupling between R&D and production groups also grows. However, current trends toward distributed development and outsourced manufacturing work to segregate these groups, increasing the chances that risk factors will be overlooked. This thesis examines the process by which new technologies are transitioned from the laboratory to the shop floor, and addresses some of the risks related to process uncertainty that arise. In particular, it focuses on those challenges that are difficult to recognize. Research for the project was conducted during a six month internship at the Raytheon Company. The transition-to-production process was segmented into three phases, and three related products were used as cases with which each phase could be studied. The problems that appeared in these cases were addressed, and the "lessons learned" were then generalized into a set of guidelines applicable to a broader range of situations.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Seward W. Pulitzer, III.en_US
dc.format.extent120 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectElectrical Engineering and Computer Science.en_US
dc.subjectSloan School of Management.en_US
dc.subjectLeaders for Manufacturing Program.en_US
dc.titleTransitioning technology from R&D to productionen_US
dc.title.alternativeTransforming technology from research and development to productionen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeM.B.A.en_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentLeaders for Manufacturing Program at MITen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
dc.contributor.departmentSloan School of Management
dc.identifier.oclc298555891en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record