Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSmith, James L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorThompson, Rex W.en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-04-03T17:06:44Z
dc.date.available2009-04-03T17:06:44Z
dc.date.issued2005en_US
dc.identifier2005-007en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/45037
dc.description.abstractConventional wisdom holds that dependence among geological prospects increases exploration risk. However, dependence also creates the option to truncate exploration if early results are discouraging. We show that the value of this option creates incentives for explorationists to plunge into dependence; i.e., to assemble portfolios of highly correlated exploration prospects. Risk-neutral and risk-averse investors are distinguished not by the plunging phenomenon, but by the threshold level of dependence that triggers such behavior. Aversion to risk does not imply aversion to dependence. Indeed the potential to plunge may be larger for risk-averse investors than for risk-neutral investors.en_US
dc.format.extent33 pen_US
dc.publisherMIT Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Researchen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMIT-CEEPR (Series) ; 05-007WP.en_US
dc.titleDiversification and the value of exploration portfoliosen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.oclc61198975en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record