Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPindyck, Robert S.en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-04-03T17:08:29Z
dc.date.available2009-04-03T17:08:29Z
dc.date.issued1999en_US
dc.identifier99005en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/45091
dc.description.abstractThe Standard framework in which economists evaluate environmental policies is cost-benefit analysis, so policy debates usually focus on the expected flows of costs and benefits, or on the choice of discount rate. But this can be misleading when there is uncertainty over future outcomes, when there are irreversibilities, and when policy adoption can be delayed. This paper shows how two kinds of uncertainty - over the future costs and benefits of reduction environmental degradation, and over the evolution of an ecosystem - interact with two kinds of irreversibilities - sunk costs associated with an environmental regulation, and "sunk benefits" of avoided environmental degradation - to affect optimal policy timing and design.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSupported by the MIT Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, the M.I.T. Program on Global Climate Change and the National Science Foundation.en_US
dc.format.extent31 pen_US
dc.publisherMIT Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Researchen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMIT-CEEPR (Series) ; 99-005WP.en_US
dc.titleIrreversibilities and the timing of environmental policyen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.oclc42077093en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record