Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorJorge R. Vera.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLim, Lui Chengen_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Computation for Design and Optimization Program.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-04-29T17:18:48Z
dc.date.available2009-04-29T17:18:48Z
dc.date.copyright2008en_US
dc.date.issued2008en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/45274
dc.descriptionThesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Computation for Design and Optimization Program, 2008.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 67-68).en_US
dc.description.abstractForest operations planning is a complex decision process which considers multiple objectives on the strategic, tactical and operational horizons. Decisions such as where to harvest and in what order over different time periods are just some of the many diverse and complex decisions that are needed to be made. An important issue in real-world optimization of forest harvesting planning is how to treat uncertainty of a biological nature, namely the uncertainty due to different growth rates of trees which affects their respective yields. Another important issue is in the effective use of high capital intensive forest harvesting machinery by suitable routing and scheduling assignments. The focus of this thesis is to investigate the effects of incorporating the robust formulation and a machinery assignment problem collectively to a forest harvesting model. The amount of variability in the harvest yield can be measured by sampling from historical data and suitable protection against uncertainty can be set after incorporating the use of a suitable robust formulation. A trade off between robustness to uncertainty with the deterioration in the objective value ensues. Using models based on industrial and slightly modified data, both the robust and routing formulations have been shown to affect the solution and its underlying structure thus making them necessary considerations. A study of feasibility using Monte Carlo simulation is then undertaken to evaluate the difference in average performances of the formulations as well as to obtain a method of setting the required protections with an acceptable probability of infeasibility under a given set of scenarios.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Lui Cheng, Lim.en_US
dc.format.extent68 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectComputation for Design and Optimization Program.en_US
dc.titleRobust scheduling in forest operations planningen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Computation for Design and Optimization Program
dc.identifier.oclc310969181en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record