Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorDiane E. Davis.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMullin, Deborah Weien_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning.en_US
dc.coverage.spatialf------ f-ke---en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-08-26T17:18:14Z
dc.date.available2009-08-26T17:18:14Z
dc.date.copyright2009en_US
dc.date.issued2009en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/46674
dc.descriptionThesis (M.C.P.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning, 2009.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 94-96).en_US
dc.description.abstractThis thesis examines the differences of Chinese and Western aid implementation and its effects in Africa though the case study of Chinese aid and finance for road development in Kenya. Today, Kenya receives tangible benefits from Chinese aid, firms, and finance in road construction. Chinese aid serves as an alternative to Western donor conditionalities in Kenya helping decrease the requirements of Western funding sources. Western aid, however, may not serve as a "substitute" for Chinese aid, therefore making Chinese aid unresponsive to Kenyan interests. The instantaneous and less bureaucratic nature of Chinese aid and China's personal interest in Kenyan infrastructure lead to an increase in road construction but eliminate Kenya's voice in Chinese aid decision. Furthermore, trainings to Kenyans illustrating a "South to South" relationship are really for building China-Kenya relations and are ineffective for Kenya's human capital development. In addition, this is the first study to outline how the combination of tying of Chinese aid to Chinese firms and China's "Go Out" policy create excessive power for Chinese companies in Kenyan road development and debt financing decisions as well as marginalize Kenya's interests. China's tying of aid and the competitive advantages of Chinese firms working in Kenya crowd out domestic industry and forfeit valuable opportunities to develop local neighboring industries. Kenya needs to treat its relationship with China not just as an aid recipient but as a player in a "mutually beneficial" relationship. In order to receive more responsive and effective aid Kenya must begin to leverage its assets desired by China in order to demand a stronger voice in aid decisions.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Deborah Wei Mullin.en_US
dc.format.extent96 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectUrban Studies and Planning.en_US
dc.titleThe alternative of Chinese aid in Africa : impacts of China's development strategy through Chinese aid, finance, and firms in Kenyaen_US
dc.title.alternativeImpacts of China's development strategy through Chinese aid, finance, and firms in Kenyaen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeM.C.P.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planning
dc.identifier.oclc428110289en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record