Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCummings, M. L.
dc.contributor.authorWang, Enlie
dc.contributor.authorHo, Angela W. L.
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Aeronautics and Astronautics. Humans and Automation Laboratory
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-18T22:10:57Z
dc.date.available2009-09-18T22:10:57Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/46752
dc.description.abstractThis study addresses this gap in CAS and intelligent alarm research by examining whether or not a single master alarm warning versus multiple warnings for the different collision warning systems conveys adequate information to the drivers. Intelligent driver warning systems signaling impending frontal and rear collisions, as well as unintentional lane departures were used in this experiment, and all the warnings were presented to drivers through the auditory channel only. We investigated two critical research questions in this study: 1. Do multiple intelligent alarms as opposed to a single master alarm affect drivers’ recognition, performance, and action when they experience a likely imminent collision and unintentional lane departure? 2. Is driver performance and overall situation awareness under the two different alarm alerting schemes affected by reliabilities of the warning systems?en
dc.description.sponsorshipPrepared For Ford Motor Companyen
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherMIT Humans and Automation Laboratoryen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesHAL Reports;HAL2006-03
dc.titleIntegrating Multiple Alarms & Driver Situation Awarenessen
dc.typeTechnical Reporten


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • HAL Reports
    Technical Reports Series - Humans and Automation Laboratory

Show simple item record