Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorCarl Wunsch.en_US
dc.contributor.authorYuan, Shaoyuen_US
dc.contributor.otherWoods Hole Oceanographic Institution.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-10-01T15:51:31Z
dc.date.available2009-10-01T15:51:31Z
dc.date.copyright2009en_US
dc.date.issued2009en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/47847
dc.descriptionThesis (S.M.)--Joint Program in Physical Oceanography (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences; and the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution), 2009.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (leaves 49-51).en_US
dc.description.abstractIf the ocean is in a statistically steady state, energy balance is a strong constraint, suggesting that the energy input into the world ocean is dissipated simultaneously at the same rate. Energy conservation is one of the most important principles in the natural world. However, the study of energy balance in the oceanic circulation has long been overlooked. Mink and Winch (1998) proposed that energy is needed to maintain the meridional overturning circulation and they also concluded that the wind energy input into the world ocean constitute the most important part. Since then, many estimates on the wind energy input have been given with a focus on different time and spatial scales. It is well known that it is the air-sea momentum flux (wind stress) that actually drives the ocean circulation, especially the upper layer circulation. Due to the difficulties of directly measuring the wind stress, different algorithms were proposed to relate the wind stress with the wind velocity and other related atmospheric and oceanic variables. Different algorithms in fact produce quite different wind stresses, which may leads to spurious estimates in the wind energy input into the world ocean. The thesis is organized as follows. In chapter 1, we try to understand the difference of four bulk algorithms, and conclude that different bulk algorithms may yield the wind energy input differences of 20%. Comparison of 4 different wind stress dataset were presented in Chapter 2. However, we do not determine which product is the best. In Chapter 3, a simple numerical experiment was executed and some preliminary estimate on the effects of introducing the wind stress dependence on the oceanic surface velocity were given. The ECCO data computation, however, does not produce the results as expected and some explanations are given.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Shaoyu Yuan.en_US
dc.format.extent51 leavesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectJoint Program in Physical Oceanography.en_US
dc.subjectEarth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences.en_US
dc.subjectWoods Hole Oceanographic Institution.en_US
dc.titleComparison of wind stress algorithms, datasets and oceanic power inputen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentJoint Program in Physical Oceanographyen_US
dc.contributor.departmentWoods Hole Oceanographic Institutionen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
dc.identifier.oclc430048167en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record