Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorDavid Wallace.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKudrowitz, Barry Men_US
dc.contributor.authorFienup, William James, 1980-en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Mechanical Engineering.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-10-06T14:59:48Z
dc.date.available2009-10-06T14:59:48Z
dc.date.copyright2005en_US
dc.date.issued2006en_US
dc.date.issued2005en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/49333
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 199-200).en_US
dc.descriptionThesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, September 2005 (first author); and, (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, June 2006 (second author).en_US
dc.description.abstract(cont.) The second concept, eDarts, involved incorporating a capacitor powered micro-circuit and LED into foam darts similar to those used in the current line of Nerf® products. The eDarts created a tracer shot or laser bullet" effect when used in low light conditions. Safety, projectile mass, and axially symmetric loading were the greatest issues of concern. The final suggested eDart incorporated a standard DC power connection with a simple mechanical switch. The eDarts reached comparable distances to the current foam darts on the market. while maintaining a safe Kinetic Energy Density.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe goal of this research has been to develop new concepts for foam projectile toys. The team followed a standard design practice and brought two unique concepts to an alpha-prototype level. Through brainstorming sessions the team generated over 100 concepts of which the sponsor selected twelve high potential concepts for first order prototyping. Of these prototypes, the team chose two concepts worthy of refinement and further development. The operational principles of the highest potential concepts were thoroughly analyzed and developed through a series of prototypes. The first concept, Hopper Popper Activation, involved using a bi-stable rubber spring to propel foam balls. This concept created a simple, space-saving, and effective means of storing energy. The hopper popper was implemented in several devices, the most successful being a small hand held toy called the Hand Popper. The greatest issue of concern with the Hopper Popper Activated concepts was the force required to load the toy. The final design implemented a low friction system with a ball guiding channel to reduce this loading force. The final design required a lower operational force than the comparable product on the market, while capable of propelling foam balls 20% further.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby William J. Fienup and Barry M. Kudrowitz.en_US
dc.format.extent200 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectMechanical Engineering.en_US
dc.titleThe exploration of concepts for projectile toysen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreesecond authoren_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering
dc.identifier.oclc86111240en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record