Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorDavid W. Miller.en_US
dc.contributor.authorJilla, Cyrus D., 1974-en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-12-10T19:07:32Z
dc.date.available2009-12-10T19:07:32Z
dc.date.copyright1999en_US
dc.date.issued1999en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/50065
dc.descriptionThesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1999.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 123-126).en_US
dc.description.abstractThrough a process of system design, analysis, and optimization, the trade space for future optical separated spacecraft interferometers (SSI's) is explored. Using Distributed Satellite System principles, eleven separate architectures ranging in size from three to five spacecraft are compared on the basis of four metrics: 1) capability, 2) performance, 3) adaptability, and 4) cost per function. The independent SSI architecture variables include the total number of spacecraft, the type of spacecraft, the number of combiner payloads, and the number of collector payloads. Architecture variables held constant in this study, but which may be varied in future studies, include the array's geometric configuration, the maximum baseline, the mass and power requirements of each payload, the spacecraft propulsion system, the component failure rates, and the mission design life. Three models are developed and coupled to analyze each architecture. A capability model calculates the instantaneous u-v coverage, image quality, angular resolution, and imaging rate of each proposed architecture. The reliability model uses combinatorial analysis and Markov techniques to determine both the probability that the system will continue to function over a given amount of time and the likelihood with which the system will function in different partially failed states throughout the mission. The reliability model is then coupled with the capability model to calculate total performance over the mission lifetime. The cost model, which is divided into payload, spacecraft bus, launch, and operations costs, estimates the total lifecycle cost of each architecture. On the basis of the cost per synthesized image metric, two architectures were identified as providing the greatest value for the money. The design features in order of importance are imaging rate, total system cost, and total system reliability.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityv by Cyrus D. Jilla.en_US
dc.format.extent154 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectAeronautics and Astronauticsen_US
dc.titleSeparated spacecraft interferometry : system architecture design and optimizationen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronauticsen_US
dc.identifier.oclc42695592en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record