Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorCharles Fine and David Simchi-Levi.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAwwad, Ghassan Samiren_US
dc.contributor.otherLeaders for Manufacturing Program.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-12-10T19:10:13Z
dc.date.available2009-12-10T19:10:13Z
dc.date.copyright2009en_US
dc.date.issued2009en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/50085
dc.descriptionThesis (M.B.A.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management; and, (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering; in conjunction with the Leaders for Manufacturing Program at MIT, 2009.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 48).en_US
dc.description.abstractSelecting and executing the optimal strategy for developing new products is a non trivial task, especially for low volume, high complexity products in a highly volatile global industry such as Fluid Management. At Fluid Management Corporation (FMC), Trucks and Equipment (T&E) that are used to deliver services both onshore and offshore currently follow a single product development model: In-house design; Outsourced prototyping, testing, and manufacturing. The objective of this research work is to challenge the status quo and to provide FMC with a practical framework that helps to determine the optimal development strategy. Rather than following a single development strategy for the entire portfolio of trucks and equipment products, the new methodology recommends a development strategy at a product functionality level and product feature level. Product development strategy is defined here using three dimensions: Design strategy; Manufacturing strategy; and Supply Chain strategy. Each functionality or feature is evaluated using a set of six criteria which then maps that functionality or feature to a specific recommended location on a three dimensional strategy cube. The set of evaluation criteria were derived from exploring and analyzing the current product development process, and from benchmarking world class companies from a wide range of different industries. The results show that for functionalities and features that differentiate FMC from its competitors and are viewed as core competencies, FMC should consider in sourcing the design, prototyping, and testing processes.en_US
dc.description.abstract(cont.) These functionalities include blending, pumping, software development, and system integration. Similarly, for functionalities and features that are not viewed as core competencies such as transport units, storage, and power generation, FMC should consider outsourcing the development process including design.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Ghassan Awwad.en_US
dc.format.extent48 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectSloan School of Management.en_US
dc.subjectCivil and Environmental Engineering.en_US
dc.subjectLeaders for Manufacturing Program.en_US
dc.titleA framework for developing, manufacturing, and sourcing trucks & equipment in a global fluid management industryen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.description.degreeM.B.A.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentLeaders for Manufacturing Program at MITen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
dc.contributor.departmentSloan School of Management
dc.identifier.oclc458562748en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record