Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPindyck, Robert S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRotemberg, Julioen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-12-15T23:52:37Z
dc.date.available2009-12-15T23:52:37Z
dc.date.issued1990en_US
dc.identifier90-008en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/50141
dc.description.abstractWe show that comovements of individual stock prices cannot be justified by economic fundamentals. This finding is a rejection of the present value model of security valuation. Unlike other tests of this model, ours is robust in that it allows for volatility in ex ante rates of return. The only constraint we impose is that investors' utilities are functions of a single consumption index. This implies that changes in discount rates must be related to changes in macroeconomic variables, and hence stock prices of companies in unrelated lines of business should move together in response to changes in current or expected future macroeconomic conditions. We also show that this constraint implies that any priced factors in the APT model must be related to macroeconomic variables. Hence our results are also a rejection of the APT, so constrained.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSupported by the International Financial Services Research Center at MIT, the MIT Center for Energy Policy Research and the National Science Foundation.en_US
dc.format.extent26 pen_US
dc.publisherMIT Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Researchen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking paper (Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Energy Policy Research) ; MIT-CEPR 90-008.en_US
dc.titleDo stock prices move together too much?en_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.oclc28596050en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record