Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPoterba, James M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-12-15T23:55:03Z
dc.date.available2009-12-15T23:55:03Z
dc.date.issued1991en_US
dc.identifier91-003en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/50159
dc.description.abstractThis paper develops several points concerning the design and implementation of a carbon tax. First, if implemented without any offsetting changes in transfer programs, the carbon tax would be regressive. This regressivity could be offset with changes in either the direct tax system or transfers. Second, the production and consumption distortions associated with small carbon taxes, on the order of $5/ton of carbon, are relatively small: less than $1 billion per year for the United States. Stabilizing carbon dioxide emissions at their 1988 levels for the year 2000, however, would require a carbon tax ten to twenty times this size. It would more than triple the producer price of coal and nearly double the producer prices of petroleum and natural gas, would have much more significant private efficiency effects. Third, a central issue of carbon tax design is harmonization with other fiscal instruments designed to reduce greenhouse warming. Ensuring comparability between taxes rates on chlorofluorocarbons and fossil fuels is particularly important to avoid unnecessary distortions in production or consumption decisions.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSupported by the Istituto san Paolo di Torino, the NSF, the MIT Center for Energy Policy Research and the John M. Olin Foundation.en_US
dc.format.extent40 pen_US
dc.publisherMIT Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Researchen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking paper (Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Energy Policy Research) ; MIT-CEPR 91-003.en_US
dc.titleTax policy to combat global warming : on designing a carbon taxen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.oclc28596145en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record