Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorMichael J. Driscoll and Neil E. Todreas.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMcMahon, Michael Vincenten_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-01-07T20:41:56Z
dc.date.available2010-01-07T20:41:56Z
dc.date.copyright1998en_US
dc.date.issued1998en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/50460
dc.descriptionThesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Nuclear Engineering, 1998.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 193-198).en_US
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this research was to use state-of-the-art nuclear and fuel performance design packages to develop extended cycle cores for existing Light Water Reactor (LWR) designs which respect current fuel burnup limits while considering the full range of practical design and economic considerations. The driving force behind this research was the desire to make nuclear power more economically competitive with fossil fuel options by permitting higher plant capacity factors. In this thesis, reference cores for a 38.8 Effective Full Power Month (EFPM) PWR cycle and a 45 EFPM BWR cycle were developed and evaluated. To achieve these cycle lengths the designs use a single batch reloading strategy and contain fuel with enrichments as high as 7.4W/0 U2 3 5 (exceeding the current licensing limit of 5W/). The PWR design uses gadolinium oxide (Gd20 3) and IFBA (Integral Fuel Burnable Absorbers - a thin fuel pellet surface coating of ZrB2) as burnable poisons to hold down excess reactivity and to control power peaking. The BWR employs only Gd203. Both core designs require higher worth control rods in order to meet shutdown safety requirements. Fuel performance issues were also investigated. The presence of high burnup fuel assemblies in areas of greater-than core-average power leads to fuel performance concerns which must be carefully addressed. The effects of waterside corrosion, increased fission gas pressure, and intensified cladding strain in these assemblies must be carefully quantified. Steady state-analyses of fuel pin internal pressure performed on the PWR design show acceptable fuel pin performance. Fuel performance areas requiring further research were highlighted. Economic calculations show that extended cycle, single batch loaded cores have a fuel cost that is $13 million to $17 million per year more expensive than an optimized multi-batch strategy. This deficit would have to be made up from the net benefits of a higher capacity factor (e.g., less replacement energy, fewer refueling outages) levelized over plant lifetime.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Michael Vincent McMahon.en_US
dc.format.extent238 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectNuclear Engineeringen_US
dc.titleModeling and design of reload LWR cores for an ultra-long operating cycleen_US
dc.title.alternativeModeling and design of reload light water reactor cores for an ultra-long operating cycleen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreePh.D.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Nuclear Science and Engineeringen_US
dc.identifier.oclc42139247en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record