Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSchmalensee, Richard
dc.date.accessioned2004-04-02T20:19:22Z
dc.date.available2004-04-02T20:19:22Z
dc.date.issued2004-04-02T20:19:22Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/5060
dc.description.abstractUS antitrust policy takes as its objective consumer welfare, not total economic welfare. With that objective, Joe Bain's definition of entry barriers is more useful than George Stigler's or definitions based on economic welfare. It follows that economies of scale that involve sunk costs may create antitrust barriers to entry. A simple model shows that sunk costs without scale economies may discourage entry without creating an antitrust entry barrier.en
dc.format.extent194770 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMIT Sloan School of Management Working Paper;4457-04
dc.subjectantitrusten
dc.subjectU.S. antitrust policyen
dc.subjectentry barriersen
dc.titleSunk Costs and Antitrust Barriers to Entryen
dc.typeWorking Paperen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record