Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDoshi, Peter
dc.date.accessioned2010-01-08T18:25:22Z
dc.date.available2010-01-08T18:25:22Z
dc.date.issued2008-01
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/50637
dc.description.abstractThe US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) claims that the single best way to prevent seasonal flu is to get vaccinated each year.1 Such confidence in influenza vaccines seems misplaced for two reasons. Firstly, if CDC viral surveillance data are correct, then in recent years true influenza viruses have caused an average of only 12% of influenza-like illness2 (the syndrome the public thinks of as "flu" and, most critically, the syndrome the public is trying to avoid). Since influenza vaccine does not work against non-influenza viruses,3 how can the agency responsibly claim vaccines are the best way to prevent seasonal flu?en
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherBritish Medical Associationen
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39465.484421.3Aen
dc.rightsArticle is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.en
dc.sourcePeter Doshien
dc.titleReason for optimismen
dc.typeOtheren
dc.identifier.citationDoshi, Peter. “Reason for optimism.” BMJ 336.7637 (2008): 172-.en
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Program in Science, Technology and Societyen_US
dc.contributor.approverDoshi, Peter
dc.contributor.mitauthorDoshi, Peter
dc.relation.journalBritish Medical Journalen
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen
dc.identifier.pmid18219007
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalItemen
dspace.orderedauthorsDoshi, P.en
mit.licensePUBLISHER_POLICYen
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record