Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEckels, Timothy J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2004-05-28T19:26:03Z
dc.date.available2004-05-28T19:26:03Z
dc.date.issued1979-12en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/5165
dc.description.abstractA potentially powerful design for the evaluation of public programs is one which combines an assessment of program processes with an experimentally oriented analysis of program outcomes. Relatively little has been written, however, on how these two evaluation approaches can best be combined. This paper proposes a framework for sequencing, in a complementary and integrated manner, elements of process evaluation and experimental or quasi-experimental design. A number of assessment sequences are proposed, and the strengths and drawbacks of each are outlined. Five evaluation studies in the criminal justice field are then discussed in order to illustrate the potential of these sequences. The paper concludes with a summary of how an experimental design and experimental outcomes can be affected by the supportive use of process evaluation.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipPrepared under Grant Number 78NI-AX-0007 from the National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice, Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, U.S. Department of Justice.en_US
dc.format.extent1746 bytes
dc.format.extent3710799 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technology, Operations Research Centeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesOperations Research Center Working Paper;OR 094-79en_US
dc.titleToward a Framework for Process Evaluationen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record