Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMinkoff, Alan S.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2004-05-28T19:26:26Z
dc.date.available2004-05-28T19:26:26Z
dc.date.issued1981-12en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/5173
dc.description.abstractFlexibility or adaptivity in public program evaluation can lead to large savings in time and money, with little or no loss in accuracy, if used properly. In this paper, guidelines are suggested for the employment of classical statistics in adaptive evaluation methodology. Through the case setting of a flu clinic, candidate techniques are demonstrated for handling problems in hypothesis testing, estimation, adaptive allocation of information-gathering resources, and before-and-after-type comparisons. In some cases, classical statistics proves quite adaptable to the requirements of the situation, while in others, its introduction is more artificial.en_US
dc.format.extent1744 bytes
dc.format.extent1895489 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technology, Operations Research Centeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesOperations Research Center Working Paper;OR 111-81en_US
dc.titleAdaptive Evaluation Methodology Prototypes: Examplesen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record