Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorHeidi M. Nepf.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRominger, Jeffrey T. (Jeffrey Tsaros)en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-03-25T14:59:37Z
dc.date.available2010-03-25T14:59:37Z
dc.date.copyright2009en_US
dc.date.issued2009en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/53090
dc.descriptionThesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2009.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 79-85).en_US
dc.description.abstractVegetation is present in nearly all aquatic environments, ranging from meandering streams to constructed channels and rivers, as well as in lakes and coastal zones. This vegetation grows in a wide range of flow environments as well, from stagnant water to highly turbulent flows dominated by waves and currents. Feedbacks between the dominant currents and the vegetation not only significantly alter the velocity structure of the flow, but play a large role in determining the spatial structure of the vegetation as well. This thesis examines these interactions through field experiments, review of existing literature and theoretical and analytical models. The first study describes a set of experiments in which vegetation was added to the point bar of a stream meander during base flow. During the next flood event, this vegetation proved to be destabilizing as a portion of the vegetation scoured away and the cross section of the open channel showed clear patterns of erosion. The secondary circulation present in the meander was significantly altered as well. In the second study, the relationship between tidal currents and the spatial distribution of seagrass meadows is examined. Seagrass beds range in their coverage from continuous meadows, to spotty swaths dominated by discrete patches. The relationship between this area coverage and tidal currents, explained by the principles of percolation theory, helps describe why certain distributions of seagrass within a meadow are more stable than others.en_US
dc.description.abstract(cont.) Drawing on the principles and examples established in the first two sections, the final section describes an analytical model for predicting vegetation coverage in a rectangular open channel. The model can allow for fixed banks, such as those in a concrete-lined channel, or can allow erosion of the boundaries, as is possible in natural streams. These two versions of the model show notably different results. Ultimately, this thesis presents multiple cases of the interactions between currents and aquatic vegetation and showcases an important example of a multi-disciplinary research approach in fluid mechanics.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Jeffrey T. Rominger.en_US
dc.format.extent126 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectCivil and Environmental Engineering.en_US
dc.titleInteractions between currents and the spatial structure of aquatic vegetationen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
dc.identifier.oclc502017590en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record