Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorDavid E. Hardt and Roy E. Welsch.en_US
dc.contributor.authorOlivella Sierra, Andrésen_US
dc.contributor.otherLeaders for Manufacturing Program.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-03-25T15:16:50Z
dc.date.available2010-03-25T15:16:50Z
dc.date.copyright2009en_US
dc.date.issued2009en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/53221
dc.descriptionThesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Engineering Systems Division; and, (M.B.A.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management; in conjunction with the Leaders for Manufacturing Program at MIT, 2009.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 52-53).en_US
dc.description.abstractCisco Systems, Inc. (Cisco) has recently adopted Six Sigma as the main platform to drive quality improvements in its manufacturing operations. A key component of the improvement strategy is the ability to define appropriate manufacturing yield goals. Cisco's manufacturing operations can be divided, at a very high level, in two major steps: Printed Circuit Board Assembly (PCBA) and System Assembly and Test. The company has already deployed a global yield goal definition methodology for the PCBA operation, but the creation of a similar methodology for the System Assembly and Test operation proved difficult: Cisco lacked a universal methodology to determine the expected variation on manufacturing performance resulting from differences on product design and manufacturing processes attributes. This thesis addresses this gap by demonstrating a methodology to relate relevant design and process attributes to the System Assembly and Test manufacturing yield performance of all products. The methodology uses statistical analysis, in particular Artificial Neural Networks, to generate a yield prediction model that achieves excellent prediction accuracy (4.8% RMS error). Although this study was performed using Cisco Systems' product and manufacturing data, the general process outlined in this exercise should be applicable to solve similar problems in other companies and industries. The core components of the methodology outlined can be easily reproduced: 1) identify the key complexity attributes, 2) design and execute a data collection plan and 3) generate statistical models to test the validity and impact of the selected factors.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Andres Olivella Sierra.en_US
dc.format.extent53 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectEngineering Systems Division.en_US
dc.subjectSloan School of Management.en_US
dc.subjectLeaders for Manufacturing Program.en_US
dc.titleEstimation of system assembly and test manufacturing yields through product complexity normalizationen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeM.B.A.en_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentLeaders for Manufacturing Program at MITen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering Systems Division
dc.contributor.departmentSloan School of Management
dc.identifier.oclc529957956en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record