Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorDouglas Hart.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCotter, Gavin Men_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Mechanical Engineering.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-28T16:57:23Z
dc.date.available2010-04-28T16:57:23Z
dc.date.issued2009en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/54531
dc.descriptionThesis (S.B.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, 2009.en_US
dc.description"June 2009." Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 19).en_US
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents a comparison of performance and efficiencies for four vehicle power architectures; the internal combustion engine (ICE), the parallel hybrid (i.e. Toyota Prius), the serial hybrid (i.e. Chevrolet Volt), and the electric vehicle (i.e. Chevrolet EV-1). These four power schemes represent the most prominent power architecture options available to automotive designers and engineers today. Experimentation was preformed using a one-man power scooter, a five horsepower ICE, an alternator, three 12 volt batteries, and an electric motor. Data was collected using an accelerometer and timing device. The ICE architecture transmits power to the wheels from only from the engine, the parallel hybrid from both the ICE and the electric motor, the serial hybrid from only the electric motor with the ICE and alternator acting as a generator, and the electric vehicle (EV) from only the electric motor. Performance was quantified through top speed and acceleration numbers for each respective architecture. Each power scheme was modeled analytically to determine theoretical efficiencies and performance numbers. These theoretical numbers were then compared to experimental data for validation. Results from testing, as well as the factors represent the ratio of each attribute to the lowest value within that category (given the value 1), are shown in figure 1 below. ICE Series Parallel EV 25.6 14.1 25.6 14.1 2.5 3.7 3.7 3.7 32.4 62.7 54.3 74.0 1.8 1 1.8 1 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.0 1.9 1.7 2.3 Figure 1: Performance and Efficiency Values for Experimental Power Schemes.en_US
dc.description.abstract(cont.) These conclusions would allow, given desired output efficiencies or performance values, an automotive designer to determine which architecture(s) would best suit their needs.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Gavin M. Cotter.en_US
dc.format.extent20 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectMechanical Engineering.en_US
dc.titleA study in hybrid vehicle architectures : comparing efficiency and performanceen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.B.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering
dc.identifier.oclc565894813en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record