Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorSarah Slaughter.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPeterson, Kristian Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorGammill, Ross Men_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Real Estate. Program in Real Estate Development.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-05-25T19:20:47Z
dc.date.available2010-05-25T19:20:47Z
dc.date.copyright2009en_US
dc.date.issued2009en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/54858
dc.descriptionThesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Program in Real Estate Development in Conjunction with the Center for Real Estate, 2009.en_US
dc.descriptionThis electronic version was submitted by the student author. The certified thesis is available in the Institute Archives and Special Collections.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from student submitted PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 118-120).en_US
dc.description.abstractNumerous studies have shown that retrofitting an office building with energy efficiency improvements can significantly reduce operating costs, yet many existing office buildings have not been retrofitted. The objective of this paper was to explore the incentives and motivations of various parties throughout the real estate management chain to better understand why investments in energy efficiency are not more prevalent. The paper focuses on investor-owned multi-tenant office properties. The authors explored the question from a qualitative and quantitative methodology. The qualitative study consisted of interviews with key players in the real estate management chain including property managers, asset managers, portfolio managers, and institutional owners. The quantitative study consisted of a financial model to compare competing alternative capital investments. The competing investments consisted of a cosmetic improvement which was modeled to either increase rents or decrease leasing costs and an energy efficiency improvement which was modeled to decrease utility costs. Multiple permutations were tested in each scenario in order to gauge the sensitivity of returns in each scenario. Both methods were designed to understand how industry participants allocated capital to energy efficiency improvements. The study determined that financial considerations are the primary drivers behind real estate investment decisions. Secondary factors that drive investments in energy efficiency improvements include fostering a positive public image, winning new business, and focusing on environmental responsibility.en_US
dc.description.abstract(cont.) Recommendations to increase investment in energy efficiency conclude the paper. Increased investment in energy efficiency will result if managers recognize that energy efficiency projects can decrease the volatility of returns, and that these returns are maximized by making the investment in energy efficiency prior to significant lease rollover.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Kristian A. Peterson [and] Ross M. Gammill.en_US
dc.format.extent140 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectCenter for Real Estate. Program in Real Estate Development.en_US
dc.titleAnalyzing capital allocation for energy efficiency improvements by commercial real estate investment managersen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Real Estate. Program in Real Estate Development.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Real Estate
dc.identifier.oclc609666967en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record