Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorT. (Teo) Forcht Dagi and Carl Berke.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRobins, Jason Sen_US
dc.contributor.otherHarvard University--MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-05-25T21:14:05Z
dc.date.available2010-05-25T21:14:05Z
dc.date.copyright2008en_US
dc.date.issued2008en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/55276
dc.descriptionThesis (S.M.)--Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, 2008.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 84-85).en_US
dc.description.abstractValuing medical device companies and technologies is a complex process. Several different approaches and models are often used in combination to determine a transaction valuation. This research uses the Enterprise Value to Forward Sales model as a tool for valuing mergers and acquisitions in the device industry. This model was selected for its transportability across industry segments, ease of calculation, broad acceptance, and lack of detailed forecasting assumptions. This research seeks to: 1) explore the importance of 20 commonly cited factors in determining a medical device company EV/Sales multiple, 2) develop a model for forecasting the EV/Sales multiple of medical device transactions, and 3) assess the explanatory power of these factors in determining the enterprise value (measured in dollars) of pre-revenue transactions. For purposes of this analysis valuation was approached from a sector neutral or portfolio diversification perspective. Multivariate regression analysis was performed on a database of 352 M&A transactions announced between January 1, 1996 and December 31, 2007 to assess the importance of various factors and develop a model for forecasting EV/Sales multiples. Consistent with our expectations, supernormal growth, industry growth, market size, sector beta, position in market, venture funding, and IPO status were all significant factors in determining the multiple. Based on these factors, we developed a model that was 95% accurate in forecasting the EV/Sales multiple of medical device transactions that occurred between January and May of 2008.en_US
dc.description.abstract(cont.) Based on the success of this model, we then explored the utility of these factors in determining the gross enterprise value of pre-revenue M&A transactions. As expected, this approach was not successful. Varying discount rates, timing assumptions, difficult to determine value synergies, and emotion are confounding factors which make it difficult to reliably forecast absolute dollar transaction valuations.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Jason S. Robins.en_US
dc.format.extent85 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectHarvard University--MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology.en_US
dc.titleMergers & acquisitions in the medical device industry : an exploration of factors influencing valuationen_US
dc.title.alternativeMergers and acquisitions in the medical device industry : an exploration of factors influencing valuationen_US
dc.title.alternativeM&A in the medical device industry : an exploration of factors influencing valuationen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentHarvard University--MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology
dc.identifier.oclc613224232en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record