Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorReilly, John M.
dc.contributor.authorSarofim, Marcus C.
dc.contributor.authorPaltsev, Sergey.
dc.contributor.authorPrinn, Ronald G.
dc.date.accessioned2004-09-20T21:30:41Z
dc.date.available2004-09-20T21:30:41Z
dc.date.issued2004-08
dc.identifier.urihttp://mit.edu/globalchange/www/abstracts.html#a114
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/5543
dc.descriptionAbstract in HTML and technical report in PDF available on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change website (http://mit.edu/globalchange/www/).en
dc.description.abstractFirst steps toward a broad climate agreement, such as the Kyoto Protocol, have focused attention on agreement with less than global geographic coverage. We consider instead a policy that is less comprehensive in term of greenhouse gases (GHGs), including only the non-CO2 GHGs, but is geographically comprehensive. Abating non-CO2 GHGs may be seen as less of a threat to economic development and therefore it may be possible to involve developing countries in such a policy who have thus far resisted limits on CO2 emissions. The policy we consider involves a GHG price of about $15 per ton carbon-equivalent (tce) levied only on the non-CO2 GHGs and held at that level through the century. We estimate that such a policy would reduce the global mean surface temperature in 2100 by about 0.57 degrees C; application of this policy to methane alone would achieve a reduction of 0.3 to 0.4 degrees C. We estimate the Kyoto Protocol in its current form would achieve a 0.30 degrees C reduction in 2100 if all Annex B Parties except the US maintained it as is through the century. Furthermore, we estimate the costs of the non-CO2 policies to be a small fraction of the Kyoto restriction. Whether as a next step to expand the Kyoto Protocol, or as a separate initiative running parallel to it, the world could make substantial progress on limiting climate change by pursuing an agreement to abate the non-CO2 GHGs. The results suggest that it would be useful to proceed on global abatement of non-CO2 GHGs so that lack of progress on negotiations to limit CO2 does not allow these abatement opportunities to slip away.en
dc.format.extent236424 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherMIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Changeen
dc.relation.ispartofseries;Report no. 114
dc.titleThe Role of Non-CO2 Greenhouse Gases in Climate Policy: Analysis Using the MIT IGSMen
dc.identifier.citationReport no. 114en


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record