Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorRandolph E. Kirchain, Jr.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKomander, Johann Kasperen_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-01T16:22:41Z
dc.date.available2010-09-01T16:22:41Z
dc.date.issued2009en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/58067
dc.descriptionThesis (S.B.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering, 2009.en_US
dc.description"June 2009." Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 62).en_US
dc.description.abstractIn light of volatile fuel prices and tightening emissions regulations, automobile manufacturers have been increasingly considering the use of light-weight magnesium in their efforts to improve fuel economy. While mainly used in minor components now, greater weight savings lie in its replacement of heavier structural components now made of extruded aluminum and stamped steel. However, as a material with generally lower mechanical properties on a volumetric basis and higher unit materials cost, magnesium introduces a strength-weight tradeoff with non-obvious total cost implications. Accordingly, manufacturers could greatly benefit from a method of systematically studying this weight-strength relationship in cost terms for extruded magnesium beams in a variety of loading scenarios. In this paper, we describe the development of an interface within a Process Based Cost Model of the extrusion process for quantifying these relationships on user defined parts. This interface consists of Visual Basic functions which dynamically compute dimensions of hollow Mg or Al extruded tubes necessary to achieve some strength constraint, input them into the cost model, and return the results.en_US
dc.description.abstract(cont.) This capability was demonstrated on a representative system - a 1 m long, 70 or 75 mm wide, 6 or 8 mm thick Mg or Al tube - for three distinct loading conditions - axial loading as quantified by Euler buckling load, deflection from center load, and deflection from end load. Results show that in non-package constrained scenarios, cost and weight savings can be achieved by switching from Al to a larger diameter Mg extrusion of equivalent strength; however, when diameter is constrained, it is neither cost nor weight-effective unless some geometric, processing, or strength constraint is somewhat relaxed. In general, switching to Mg is favorable when specific strength rather than absolute strength is more important. While intrinsic characteristics of the model limit practical usefulness in some cases, it is nevertheless very helpful in studying relative differences between the strength, weight, and cost of extruded Mg and Al beams.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Johann Kasper Komander.en_US
dc.format.extent72 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectMaterials Science and Engineering.en_US
dc.titleAn approach to modeling the cost-strength-weight tradeoff in aluminum and magnesium extrusions for automotive applicationsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.B.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Materials Science and Engineering
dc.identifier.oclc618741783en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record