Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorEdward S. Steinfeld.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCunningham, Edward A., IV (Edward Albert)en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Political Science.en_US
dc.coverage.spatiala-cc---en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-02T17:19:09Z
dc.date.available2010-09-02T17:19:09Z
dc.date.copyright2009en_US
dc.date.issued2009en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/58272
dc.descriptionThesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Political Science, 2009.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 226-244).en_US
dc.description.abstractThis study addresses the extent to which China's central state devolved ownership and investment levels in its energy sector to other actors during the modern reform period (1978- 2008). The project focused on China's coal and electric power industries, leveraging industry and government data, interviews, two firm case studies and a unique survey to measure policy, ownership and investment change over time. The results show that such devolution has been neither incrementally advancing nor consistently lacking, but has fluctuated according to the national electric power balance. The study suggests that China's central state actively manages the range of firms in the strategic coal and electric power industries as a dynamic portfolio of assets, resulting in such fluctuation. These findings run counter to what the dominant theories in the literature would otherwise predict. Neo-liberal theory would predict the incremental reduction of central state ownership in these sectors, as is evident in many of China's other sectors. Arguments predicated on the ability of the central state to sustain "self-reproducing authoritarianism" would predict fairly stable levels of central state investment and ownership in this strategic sector through time as well as quite limited liberalization. Finally, a theory privileging elite politics would indeed predict fluctuations, yet at different turning points in time than those found in this study, and without the sustained pattern that is evident in the extended time period under examination, which spans four distinct political eras.en_US
dc.description.abstract(cont.) This first implication of this study is that neo-liberal means can be deployed to achieve state-led ends. Second, the study provides evidence that such means of economic liberalization reform need not be cumulative and are, in fact, reversible. Third, the case studies reveal that firm decisions have a significant impact on the execution of these powerful broad central state policy changes that periodically reshape the structure of China's energy sector. Finally, this study also raises important implications relating to public policy, and in particular the ability of the Chinese state to fulfill aggressive greenhouse gas emission reductions in an effort to mitigate climate change.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Edward A. Cunningham, IV.en_US
dc.format.extent244 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectPolitical Science.en_US
dc.titleA portfolio approach to energy governance : state management of China's coal and electric power supply industriesen_US
dc.title.alternativeState management of China's coal and electric power supply industriesen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreePh.D.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Political Science
dc.identifier.oclc625106095en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record