Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorLynn M. Fisher.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSparks, Holly Joen_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning.en_US
dc.coverage.spatialn-us-maen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-03T18:31:35Z
dc.date.available2010-09-03T18:31:35Z
dc.date.copyright2010en_US
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/58381
dc.descriptionThesis (M.C.P.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning, 2010.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 57-63).en_US
dc.description.abstractThis research is designed to examine the potential mismatch between neighborhood stabilization plans and resources with the unique needs of smaller post-industrial cities in the United States. Given the distinct demographic, economic and physical characteristics of smaller, postindustrial cities, I rely on Lawrence, MA as a case study to examine housing tenure and homeownership strategies-particularly within the current economic climate and foreclosure crisis. The primary goal of this thesis is to combine first-hand observations with quantitative analysis in order to address the question: is increasing homeownership an appropriate and feasible goal for cities with high concentrations of poverty and a prevalence of multi-family housing stock? If not, what alternative housing strategies and policy approaches are needed in order to stabilize distressed neighborhoods and improve quality of living? Consistent with Lawrence's growing challenge with foreclosures and research on low-income homeownership, the findings of this thesis demonstrate that focusing on homeownership strategies in Lawrence and other smaller, post-industrial cities may not lead to more stable neighborhoods. To the contrary, due to localized concentrations of poverty and multi-family housing stock, homeownership strategies serve to put low-income households at greater risk while neglecting the needs of the most distressed neighborhoods altogether.en_US
dc.description.abstract(cont.) Further, this thesis examines alternative forms of housing tenure, arguing that neighborhood stability does not accompany increased homeownership, per se, but rather, is facilitated by healthy residential environments where residents choose to stay. Thus, this thesis recommends that Lawrence pursue housing strategies that seek to improve residential stability in distressed neighborhoods, while simultaneously developing a diversity of tenure options for individual households.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Holly Jo Sparks.en_US
dc.format.extent63 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectUrban Studies and Planning.en_US
dc.titleRethinking homeownership : why alternative tenure strategies are needed to stabilize neighborhoods in Lawrence, MAen_US
dc.title.alternativeWhy alternative tenure strategies are needed to stabilize neighborhoods in Lawrence, MAen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeM.C.P.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planning
dc.identifier.oclc630153224en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record