Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorFiona Murray.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHachiya, Masanorien_US
dc.contributor.otherSloan School of Management.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-10-12T16:23:13Z
dc.date.available2010-10-12T16:23:13Z
dc.date.copyright2010en_US
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/59120
dc.descriptionThesis (M.B.A.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, 2010.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 73-74).en_US
dc.description.abstractThis thesis reviews Sony's successes and failures in product innovations from the 1950s into the 2000s. It analyzes key success factors in Sony's significant sales and profit growth in each decade. Sony's first business success-the transistor radio and TV business in the 1950s and 1960s-was based on a process that combined new technologies to improve affordability and create new markets. During the video product development of the 1970s, Sony created three core competences: a knowledge-sharing culture, a knowledge management system for tuning technology, and a "waterfall" strategy, which increased market value and maximized opportunities for Sony and its partners. As a result, Sony became competitive in new businesses and technology idea generation, resource utilization, and cost reduction and premium pricing. This contributed to rapid revenue and profit growth during the 1970s and the 1980s. The turning point was the 1990s when Sony's knowledge-sharing culture disintegrated, and the R&D organization structure became a divisional self-supporting system. As a result, Sony lost its key advantages and subsequently delayed development of its core hardware and PC software-the keys to maintaining competitive advantage in the digital consumer electronics industry. Thus, from the mid-1990s, Sony began to lose market share even in areas where it had held a dominant position since the 1980s. By analyzing these successes and failures, I determined six key factors of success: (1) value capturing (cost) advantage, (2) strong leadership, (3) strong technology advantage, (4) efficient use of HR, internal/external know-how, (5) a rich flow of business/ technology ideas, and (6) incentives for suppliers. These factors meant the difference between success and failure, and they are now what Sony should focus on in order to succeed in the future. Finally, I propose two solutions that will enable Sony to fulfill the six success factors and regain its knowledge-sharing culture. These solutions are: (1) unification of the microprocessor platform, and (2) development of an open application aggregation platform. Both are practical and strong solutions, which Sony should aggressively adopt in order to revive its corporate culture and R&D structure of the Golden Decades.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Masanori Hachiya.en_US
dc.format.extent74 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectSloan School of Management.en_US
dc.titleHistorical review of Sony's innovations and future stepsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeM.B.A.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentSloan School of Management
dc.identifier.oclc658826802en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record