Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorJ. Bradley Morrison.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNguyen, Linda T. (Linda Thi)en_US
dc.contributor.otherSystem Design and Management Program.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-10-12T18:59:46Z
dc.date.available2010-10-12T18:59:46Z
dc.date.copyright2010en_US
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/59260
dc.descriptionThesis (S.M. in System Design and Management)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Engineering Systems Division, 2010.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 86-87).en_US
dc.description.abstractThis work investigates the overload problems of one product development department in a consumer products company. Many in the organization attribute the problem to an external source - a burgeoning product portfolio. The most common solution posed is to split the department into two in order to reap the productivity gains of specialization and reduce the overload. It is proposed that some of the overload is internally generated and specialization alone will not be enough. There is a Reinventing the Wheel phenomenon that occurs when projects are handed off from one person to another. Additional work is generated with each hand off. This problem can be exacerbated by high turnover, lack of documentation, switch loss, or delays in project completion. System dynamics models were created to explore the feedback loops, delayed effects of managerial decisions and resulting behavior of the system. Results showed that specialization leads to initially high productivity, but the gains decrease over time as breadth of experience across the organization decays and rework and coordination costs increase. It is also shown that overload could be internally generated through managerial policies. If these policies are not changed, specializing may not be as effective. Recommendations include considering turnover as part of project planning and carefully monitoring workload so that the productivity does not plummet and affect all programs. Specialization is a good solution in some cases, but is not the best solution for work that requires a great deal of interaction between functions, where the level of coordination required to share knowledge outweighs the productivity gains.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Linda Thi Nguyen.en_US
dc.format.extent110 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectEngineering Systems Division.en_US
dc.subjectSystem Design and Management Program.en_US
dc.titleIs specialization the most effective solution to overload? : a system dynamics exploration of a product development organizationen_US
dc.title.alternativeSystem dynamics exploration of a product development organizationen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.in System Design and Managementen_US
dc.contributor.departmentSystem Design and Management Program.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering Systems Division
dc.identifier.oclc667705796en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record