Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorM. Nafi Toksöz.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKrasovec, Mary L. (Mary Lee), 1972-en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-10-29T18:01:48Z
dc.date.available2010-10-29T18:01:48Z
dc.date.copyright2001en_US
dc.date.issued2001en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/59648
dc.descriptionThesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, 2001.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 147-152).en_US
dc.description.abstractThis thesis presents imaging results from a 3D reverse vertical seismic profile (RVSP) dataset measured at a hydrocarbon bearing pinnacle reef in northern Michigan. The study presented many challenges in seismic data processing and imaging, as the survey geometry was unique in several ways. Reverse VSP, which uses seismic sources in a borehole and receivers on the earth's surface, is fairly rare. RVSP in 3D with a random distribution of surface geophones is unprecedented. At the time this data was collected, no commercially available processing tools existed to address this geometry, so a processing scheme had to be developed. The data processing sequence presented in this thesis, which includes amplitude corrections, first break picking, deconvolution, wavefield separation, and application of statics, takes advantage of the repeatible signature of the new downhole source (Paulsson et al., 1998). Since the data can be handled in common-receiver gathers instead of the usual common-source gathers, it can be treated like several single offset VSPs during the processing sequence. Issues related to the 3D geometry and the random distribution of the receiver array need not be addressed until the imaging step. The generalized Radon transform (GRT) migration method of Miller et al. (1987) provides a high resolution image of a portion of the target reef at 4600 feet (1400 meters) depth. The high resolution of the image is largely due to the downhole source, which generated a high powered signal at frequencies up to several hundred Hertz. Another factor in the high resolution of the image is the success of receiver consistent model-based Wiener deconvolution (Haldorsen et al., 1994), possible because the source signature was repeatable. Due to adverse conditions and power system failure, a large portion of the surface array did not record data.en_US
dc.description.abstract(cont.) The reduced spatial coverage limits the extent of the migrated image, precluding an evaluation of the effectiveness of the random receiver spread. The limited nature of the receiver array also caused artifacts resembling migration smiles in the image. These artifacts are partially suppressed by limiting the aperture of the migration, but this also removes dipping reflectors from the image. To maximize the imaging capibilities of the data, a second approach complimenting the GRT method is developed. This approach, termed vector image isochron (VII) migration, removes array artifacts from the image without losing energy from dipping reflectors. This allows artifacts in the conventional image to be identified, aiding interpretation of the GRT images. VII images also show more even illumination than conventional images, although an effect similar to NMO stretching reduces the resolution of the VII image as compared to the GRT image. The VII scheme is an extension of the GRT migration process of Miller et al. (1987), but involves forming an image which depends on the imaged plane orientation, transforming the image based on the array geometry, then finishing the GRT summation over plane orientations. The VII imaging method is derived in both 2D and 3D with the assumption that the ray paths are straight and that at least one of the arrays, source or receiver, is horizontally oriented. The surface array can have any distribution, regular or random. The other array can have any orientation in general, although this thesis assumes that it will be either another surface array or a vertically oriented borehole array. ...en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Mary L. Krasovec.en_US
dc.format.extent184 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectEarth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences.en_US
dc.titleSubsurface imaging with reverse vertical seismic profilesen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreePh.D.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
dc.identifier.oclc49545785en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record