Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorAnne Whiston Spirn.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBozorg, Leilaen_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning.en_US
dc.coverage.spatialn-us-moen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-10-29T18:20:23Z
dc.date.available2010-10-29T18:20:23Z
dc.date.copyright2010en_US
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/59715
dc.descriptionThesis (M.C.P.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning, 2010.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 80-85).en_US
dc.description.abstractThe Kansas City Green Impact Zone of Missouri is a regionally administered, place-based initiative that emerged in direct response to the 2009 "federal moment" symbolized by the creation of the White House Office of Urban Affairs and the passing of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act and the Livable Communities Act. The initiative aims to coordinate and concentrate new resources in a 150-block area that - once the target of formal disinvestment and segregation - is now home to some of Kansas City's poorest African American families. This thesis uses the deep-case study approach to examine how place-based programs can simultaneously promote the three Es of sustainability (equity, the environment, and the economy) and to understand the challenges to organizing and implementing such initiatives. The thesis first reviews the people vs. place debate in urban policy, and introduces into that debate literature on spatial justice and sustainable development, to claim a role for equity concerns in the current urban policy and planning agendas. To understand the context in which the Green Impact Zone operates and the source of the problems it hopes to address through place-based investment and programming, the thesis then describes the history of decisions, policies, and programs that created a racialized, inequitable, and unsustainable landscape in Kansas City. The thesis then describes the process of developing the Green Impact Zone initiative, evaluating the strengths of the model and the challenges it has experienced to date, to draw lessons and make recommendations at two scales. The thesis concludes by suggesting that to effectively promote sustainability in all its three Es (equity, environment, economy), Engagement must be considered as a fourth E.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Leila Bozorg.en_US
dc.format.extent86 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectUrban Studies and Planning.en_US
dc.titleSpatializing social equity through place-based policies : lessons from the Green Impact Zone of Missouri, in Kansas City, MOen_US
dc.title.alternativeGreen Impact Zone of Missouri, in Kansas City, MOen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeM.C.P.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planning
dc.identifier.oclc668441653en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record