Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorUte Meta Bauer.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAhmed, Haseeb Waqaren_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Architecture.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-03-07T15:14:34Z
dc.date.available2011-03-07T15:14:34Z
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/61557
dc.descriptionThesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Architecture, 2010.en_US
dc.description"September 2010." Page 127 blank. Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 125-126).en_US
dc.description.abstractIn the context of art to replicate is to re-create and transpose an architectural space that is geographically or historically remote in a chosen site in the present. The replica binds itself to the original and creates a register for continuity and change across vast expanses. The existent world is uzsed to produce its mirror image; those who see themselves in the original must confront their own image. In the practice of Replication an artist invests nearly all of her artistic freedom in a single decision: what should be reproduced in the present so that it may continue into the future? Together the Replicators proclaim 'The World has already been Made!' but what then delays utopia? In the last two years we have seen a massive upsurge in the use of replication as a strategy to produce meaning. Of these works I have chosen three: Yael Bartana's Wall and Tower (2009), Laurent Grasso's HAARP (2009), and Daniel G. Baird's Soyuz/ Progress (2008), that demonstrate a multiplicity of historical and technological concerns that are the inevitably object of replication. Replication belongs first and foremost to the scientific method as fact is only fact insofar as it can be reproduced anywhere in the world at any time.My contribution treats the technical institute of MIT as a site for the production of meaning instead of as a site for the production of reproducible technical knowledge. My works Shamshir+Windtunnel=Progress (2008-09), Daedalus: Holding Problem/Problem (2010), and the two part project The Sun Sets at Teufelsberg (2009) and Remote Viewing.: Teufelsberg (2010) seek to sustain and inhabit the space of translation between the original object and its replica. This thesis consists of in-depth studies of works by my contemporaries together with my own installations. Lastly I chart a path through art history beginning in 1968 that leads up to the development of the strategy of Replication in contemporary art in the present.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Haseeb Waqar Ahmed.en_US
dc.format.extent127 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectArchitecture.en_US
dc.titleThe Replicator : on the social destruction of fact through replication as arten_US
dc.title.alternativeOn the social destruction of fact through replication as arten_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Architecture
dc.identifier.oclc703171985en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record