Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorAdjunct Professor Terry Szold.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSimonson, Kristin (Kristin Andrea)en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Real Estate. Program in Real Estate Development.en_US
dc.coverage.spatialn-us-maen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-06-06T17:45:36Z
dc.date.available2011-06-06T17:45:36Z
dc.date.copyright2011en_US
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/63239
dc.descriptionThesis (M.C.P.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning; and, (S.M. in Real Estate Development)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Program in Real Estate Development in Conjunction with the Center for Real Estate, 2011.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 121-128).en_US
dc.description.abstractThis thesis is an inquiry into the feasibility of creating new compact, mixed-use transit-oriented development (TOD) within existing suburbs. I have focused on the entitlement phase of projects, during which land is rezoned, permits are granted and development agreements are struck. Municipalities and developers must work together during this process, and I sought to understand the issues from both sides. For TOD's in Boston's suburbs that have successfully made it through the entitlement phase, what were the most pivotal issues? Pivotal factors can be positive or negative, and either help advance the project or create sticking points. In the case of problematic issues, how were they resolved? To answer these questions, this thesis investigates three case studies: Station Landing in Medford, the Hingham Shipyard in Hingham and Westwood Station in Medford. All three cases had some pivotal issues in common, although resolution varied among cases. Political will, prior zoning and planning done by the municipality, traffic and schools were important factors in every case. Recommendations to planners and developers are as follows: - It's important for both planners and developers to understand the "other side." Working groups are an innovative way to vet issues. - TOD is not for the faint of heart. Projects require vision, leadership and political will. - Experience (especially with similar past projects) matters. - Clear language in the zoning bylaw is crucial. - Predictable mitigation is best. - Planners and developers should look for ways to phase projects and create opportunities for smaller developments. - Transit may not be a necessary ingredient. Flexibility in thinking about TOD and smart growth is vital. Interestingly, while the thesis focuses on TOD, I found that transit was not a critical component for any of the three cases. Therefore, I believe that the findings of this thesis are more broadly applicable to many forms of compact, mixed-use infill development within the suburbs.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Kristin Simonson.en_US
dc.format.extent128 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectUrban Studies and Planning.en_US
dc.subjectCenter for Real Estate. Program in Real Estate Development.en_US
dc.titleAdvancing TOD in Boston's suburbs : advantages and obstacles in the entitlement processen_US
dc.title.alternativeAdvancing transit-oriented development in Boston's suburbsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.in Real Estate Developmenten_US
dc.description.degreeM.C.P.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Real Estate. Program in Real Estate Development.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Real Estate
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planning
dc.identifier.oclc726710477en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record