Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorChryssostomos Chryssostomidis.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKravitz, Eyalen_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Mechanical Engineering.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-08-18T19:16:43Z
dc.date.available2011-08-18T19:16:43Z
dc.date.copyright2011en_US
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/65309
dc.descriptionThesis (S.M. in Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering; and, (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, 2011.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 111-115).en_US
dc.description.abstractContra-rotating propellers have renewed interest from the naval architecture community, because of the recent development of electric propulsion drives and podded propulsors. Contrarotating propulsion systems have the hydrodynamic advantages of recovering part of the slipstream rotational energy which would otherwise be lost utilizing a conventional screw propeller system. The application of this type of propulsion becomes even more attractive with the increasing emphasis on fuel economy and the improvement of the propulsive efficiency. OPENPROP is an open source propeller design and analysis code that has been in development at MIT since 2007. This thesis adds another feature to the project with the off design analysis of a contra-rotating propeller set. Based on this code, the thesis offers a comparative analysis of two types of propulsors: a single propeller and a contra-rotating propeller set, which were designed for the DDG-51 destroyer class vessel. This thesis also presents the method for using these off-design analysis results to estimate ship powering requirements and fuel usage. The results show the superiority of the contra-rotating propeller over the traditional single propeller, with increased propeller efficiency of about 9% at the design point and up to 20% at some of the off design states. The annual fuel consumption savings for the DDG-51 equipped with a CRP was a total of 8.8% fuel savings.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Eyal Kravitz.en_US
dc.format.extent142 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectMechanical Engineering.en_US
dc.titleAnalysis and experiments for contra-rotating propelleren_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.in Naval Architecture and Marine Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering
dc.identifier.oclc745772117en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record