Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorPeter Paul Belobaba.en_US
dc.contributor.authorJain, Himanshu, S.M. Massachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-11-01T19:54:45Z
dc.date.available2011-11-01T19:54:45Z
dc.date.copyright2011en_US
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/66865
dc.descriptionThesis (S.M. in Transportation)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2011.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 139-142).en_US
dc.description.abstractThe primary motivations for the formation of airline alliances have been to increase revenues and decrease costs for alliance partners. A major advantage comes through increase in the number of destinations served by an airline at little costs, by using codesharing. Airlines share seat inventory on each other's codeshare flights which complicates their revenue management practice and leads to sub optimal revenue gains. This thesis analyzes the challenges related to alliance revenue management in practice and proposes innovative and feasible solutions to increase revenues for the combined alliance. The four key dimensions of the alliance revenue management problem are analyzed: recording & forecasting, seat allocation method or optimizer, codeshare valuation in the optimizer and availability control of codeshare bookings. The performance of different techniques is quantified using the Passenger Origin-Destination Simulator (PODS). It is found that sharing of information between partners to different degrees can be used to improve revenues. A new valuation scheme called dynamic valuation is developed in an effort to increase the combined alliance revenues by using bid price sharing, a method of sharing information related to codeshare legs. Dynamic valuation leads to additional revenue gains in the range of 0.30% to 0.50% over other techniques. This can translate into an incremental revenue gain, up to $ 100 M per year, for larger airlines in alliance partnerships. Dynamic valuation also provides a basis for further development of models related to revenue sharing proportions of alliance partners. The challenges and risks involved in implementing dynamic valuation are discussed.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Himanshu Jain.en_US
dc.format.extent142 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectCivil and Environmental Engineering.en_US
dc.titleAlliance revenue management in practice : techniques and simulation analysisen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.in Transportationen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
dc.identifier.oclc758163038en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record