Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorCharles H. Fine.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKao, Chung-Enen_US
dc.contributor.otherSystem Design and Management Program.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-12-09T21:23:09Z
dc.date.available2011-12-09T21:23:09Z
dc.date.copyright2010en_US
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/67555
dc.descriptionThesis (S.M. in Engineering and Management)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Engineering Systems Division, System Design and Management Program, June 2011.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 76-81).en_US
dc.description.abstractOver the past two decades, the advent of information and communication technology has broken physical distance limits and enabled seamless collaboration models, real-time planning, and quick responses among participants in supply chain systems. Globalization, specification, and the use of technologies that pursue low costs with high services have been dominating the supply chain design for years. Since 9/11 in 2001, however, supply chain designs have shifted from concentrating on cost-competitive advantages to security, collaboration, robustness, and flexibility. After 2008, worldwide events such as fluctuating gasoline prices, increased labor costs in developing countries, volatile demand as a result of the economic recession, and environmental regulations and agreements have resulted in renewed scrutiny of supply chain design paradigms. These challenges not only have had an impact on supply chain operations, but also on its architecture: in the aspects of organization, culture, geography, and information. Obviously, expanding globalization has made it difficult to consider a system locally and closely. The interactions between internal and external stimulus, multiple stakeholders' goals, along with corporate bottom lines: sociality, plant, and profits have conducted a supply chain a complex system. In order to resolve this complexity, to understand the supply chain holistically, and to avoid applying a complex solution on a complex supply chain system, a supply chain architecting framework, derived from Systems Engineering and System Architecture, is proposed in this research to simplify the supply chain architecting process into steps: modeling, mapping, and linking operational and architectural improvements. In summary, the goals of this study are: (1) Eliminate the gaps between corporate (supply chain) strategy, design, and implementation; (2) Propose a framework consisting of previous research and best practices; (3) Develop a simple, easy-to-understand, planning modeling methodology that carries sufficient information for supply chains. The contributions of this study aligned with these three goals are: (1) Supply chain architecting framework, including the fulfillment and value chains and the three improvement cycles; and (2) Architecting methodology, including concept, form, and function, as well as three layers of views from which to represent a supply chain.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Chung-En (Conrad) Kao.en_US
dc.format.extent81 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectEngineering Systems Division.en_US
dc.subjectSystem Design and Management Program.en_US
dc.titleA systematic architecting approach for supply chainsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.in Engineering and Managementen_US
dc.contributor.departmentSystem Design and Management Program.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering Systems Division
dc.identifier.oclc761392382en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record