Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorEllen Dunham-Jones.Yet we remain far from a theoretical or philosophical consensus regarding exactly what constitutes the (necessarily re-formed) public sphere. It follows, then, that architecture, historically the medium of choice for the public expression of consensual social paradigms, is, as a profession, at a loss to define the conceptual parameters for an appropriate contemporary approach to public design. This thesis, consisting of two components-a written text and an architectural design-draws on theoretical debates on the "public sphere" (assuming one still exists as such) in the definition of the issues to be addressed in the contemporary design of "public space". I have used a 1993 design competition co-sponsored by the AlAS and Graphisoft, Inc., entitled "Beyond the Border", (see appendix 1) as a vehicle for the architectural component of this investigation. The site, a proposed border crossing near EI Paso, Texas and Ciudad Juarez, Mexico, brings into play many of what I feel to be the central issues-the redefined role of the nation-state, the formation of community identity, difference, and class-to be addressed in a redefinition of the public sphere, with consequences for an architecture of public space.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMar, Erik Chia-Kongen_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Architecture.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-01-12T18:37:47Z
dc.date.available2012-01-12T18:37:47Z
dc.date.copyright1995en_US
dc.date.issued1995en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/68304
dc.descriptionThesis (M. Arch.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Architecture, 1995.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 89-92).en_US
dc.description.abstractWith the much-commented upon shifts in the global economy and the problematizing of traditional social, economic, cultural, and political relationships, the role of architecture as a "public" practice has fallen under scrutiny. The "privatization of public space", resulting from the overt merging of "public" concerns (typically represented through the State) and "private" interests (in our society, usually defined by groups with significant power over investment decisions) is often taken as symptomatic of a general trend towards the breakdown of democracy itself. Here, however, it is important to differentiate between what can be termed the "public sphere", or the abstract discursive arena where thought is (re)produced and debated, and "public space", or the actual built spaces of personal encounter among strangers. Certainly, since the Enlightenment when the terms first acquired widespread currency, the latter has depended upon some conception of the former.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityEric Chia-Kong Mar.en_US
dc.format.extent92 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectArchitecture.en_US
dc.subject.lccn-us--- n-mx---en_US
dc.titleMexico -- space/nation/class -- U.S.en_US
dc.title.alternativeMexico -- space/nation/class -- United Statesen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeM.Arch.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Architecture
dc.identifier.oclc33342435en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record