Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorEric Klopfer.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLo, Monique (Monique Chun-Ying), 1978-en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-01-12T19:22:32Z
dc.date.available2012-01-12T19:22:32Z
dc.date.copyright2001en_US
dc.date.issued2001en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/68377
dc.descriptionThesis (M.C.P.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning, 2001.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (leaf 46).en_US
dc.description.abstractAntibiotic-resistant bacteria pose a serious threat to immuno-compromised individuals in Intensive Care Units (ICU). This study examines several cycling treatments (7,14,30,60,120,240-day cycle) and random fraction treatment (50-50,60-40,80-20,100-0) strategies in ICU and finds that no single strategy will outperform all others. Human, hospital and pathogen conditions such as admission/departure rate, transmission rate, drug application rate, and incoming patients' characteristics influence the selection of the optimal treatment strategy. Random fraction treatment is generally favored when admission/departure rate is large. Cycling treatment is generally favored when admission/departure rate is small. When transmission rates are high, longer cycle period are preferred. When transmission rates are low, random fraction treatments are preferred. For cycling treatments, longer cycle periods is associated with lower drug application rates whereas shorter cycle periods are associated with larger drug application rates.Antibiotic-resistant bacteria pose a serious threat to immuno-compromised individuals in Intensive Care Units (ICU). This study examines several cycling treatments (7,14,30,60,120,240-day cycle) and random fraction treatment (50-50,60-40,80-20,100-0) strategies in ICU and finds that no single strategy will outperform all others. Human, hospital and pathogen conditions such as admission/departure rate, transmission rate, drug application rate, and incoming patients' characteristics influence the selection of the optimal treatment strategy. Random fraction treatment is generally favored when admission/departure rate is large. Cycling treatment is generally favored when admission/departure rate is small. When transmission rates are high, longer cycle period are preferred. When transmission rates are low, random fraction treatments are preferred. For cycling treatments, longer cycle periods is associated with lower drug application rates whereas shorter cycle periods are associated with larger drug application rates.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Monique Lo.en_US
dc.format.extent54 leavesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectUrban Studies and Planning.en_US
dc.titleModeling and study of infectious disease : stochastic modeling for antibiotic resistance and treatment strategiesen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeM.C.P.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planning
dc.identifier.oclc50336422en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record