dc.contributor.advisor | Joseph Ferreira, Jr. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Kumar, Chitra M., 1977- | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning. | en_US |
dc.coverage.spatial | n-usn-- | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-01-12T19:23:07Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-01-12T19:23:07Z | |
dc.date.copyright | 2002 | en_US |
dc.date.issued | 2002 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/68384 | |
dc.description | Thesis (M.C.P.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning, 2002. | en_US |
dc.description | Includes bibliographical references (leaves 81-85). | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Over the past decade scholars, scientists, and community advocates have argued that minority and low-income communities have been exposed to disproportionate amounts of hazardous pollution as a result of systematic biases in policy making and discriminatory market forces. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) is an important tool used to assist regulatory agencies in identifying these potentially vulnerable or "potential environmental justice" areas so that programmatic decision-making can incorporate EJ concerns. Yet, few studies have documented or evaluated methodologies for EJ-GIS analyses utilized by public agencies. This paper explores various methodologies that approximate where communities at risk of disproportionate burden may be with respect to the unique character and composition of New England. Specific variables explored are race/ethnicity, poverty, and population density. For each variable a scale and threshold/reference value is determined; also, the possibility of establishing a ranking system was contemplated. The importance of investigating spatial clustering and integrating variables into combined criteria was also discussed. This research began with the problem being framed. Then, a survey of the literature and public institutions was done to identify relevant practices and state-of-the-art technology in environmental justice analysis. Next, a process was designed to develop and select an appropriate methodology. This process included meeting systematically with members of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency New England GIS team and Mapping Workgroup of the Environmental Justice Council to discuss and compare various methods of analysis. Based on research results, recommendations were made to the EPA New England regional office on how to improve their demographic mapping system. These recommendations are hoped to be adopted by EPA New England and introduced in a desktop GIS tool by the end of 2002. | en_US |
dc.description.statementofresponsibility | by Chitra M. Kumar. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 91 leaves (some folded) | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | en_US |
dc.rights | M.I.T. theses are protected by
copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but
reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written
permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission. | en_US |
dc.rights.uri | http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582 | en_US |
dc.subject | Urban Studies and Planning. | en_US |
dc.title | GIS methods for screening potential environmental justice areas in New England | en_US |
dc.title.alternative | Geographic information systems methods for screening potential environmental justice areas in New England | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dc.description.degree | M.C.P. | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planning | |
dc.identifier.oclc | 50822071 | en_US |