Best antibiotics for buccal delivery
Author(s)
Goldberg, Manijeh Nazari
DownloadFull printable version (7.790Mb)
Other Contributors
Harvard University--MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology.
Advisor
Robert S. Langer, Jr. and Frederick H. Bowman.
Terms of use
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
The purpose of the research was to identify the clinical and commercial benefits of switching from intravenous (IV) to buccal delivery of antibiotics. then, the research continued to select 3-5 antibiotics that best met the buccal delivery and market requirements. Methods: The research began with the hypothesis that some injectable antibiotics are good candidates for buccal delivery even with the limitations imposed by the buccal tissue. The thesis captures a two-year research period encompassing three critical fronts - the clinical viability of switching from IV to buccal delivery for antibiotics, the market's desire and readiness to switch, and the antibiotic brands available for commercialization. Then the research moved to drug identification and selection in order to assess the antibiotics that would best function in the buccal delivery model. Results: Intravenous (IV) antibiotics are usually reserved for severe infections that require faster treatment. Less aggressive bacterial growths are treated with oral antibiotics, which has fewer side effects and complications. In the past two decades, the understanding of drug transport across different tissues has increased resulting in improved patient adherence to the therapeutic regimen and pharmacologic response. The administration of drugs by transdermal or transmucosal routes are relatively painless, offers patients more choices, and reduces the need to establish intravenous access, which is a particular benefit for children and elderly. These alternative methods also provide clinical care providers with more choices to better manage their patient's course of treatment. In the past, clinicians administered sedatives, narcotics, and a variety of other medications by transdermal, sublingual, nasal, rectal, and even tracheal-mucosal routes. These delivery options have provided flexible practice settings and this paper intends to show that antibiotics could be the next set of drugs to be administered in variety of ways to provide patients and clinicians the best array of choices. Conclusion: A few years ago, the buccal delivery method was fairly unknown. However, advances in nano encapsulation, physiology, toxicity, and the availability of certain drugs make the timing ideal for introducing antibiotics that have undergone a highly selective process for delivering through the buccal tissue.
Description
Thesis (S.M.)--Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, 2011. Cataloged from PDF version of thesis. Includes bibliographical references (p. 64-66).
Date issued
2011Department
Harvard University--MIT Division of Health Sciences and TechnologyPublisher
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Keywords
Harvard University--MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology.