Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorT. (Teo) Forcht Dagi and Jeffrey Karp.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTruesdell, John A., Jr. (John Alan)en_US
dc.contributor.otherHarvard University--MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-01-12T19:30:18Z
dc.date.available2012-01-12T19:30:18Z
dc.date.copyright2011en_US
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/68470
dc.descriptionThesis (S.M.)--Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, 2011.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 50-51).en_US
dc.description.abstractThe National Institutes of Health (NIH) has been the stalwart of research funding at universities and academic teaching hospitals. However, since the start of the last decade NIH funding has contracted in real terms. Anticipating future Federal Government fiscal austerity, the situation appears unlikely to improve and most likely will become worse. Local area teaching hospitals have explored other funding to support their large research infrastructure such as industry-sponsored research. This thesis qualitatively assessed whether the Federal Government and local area academic hospital fiscal data over the last six years support the hypothesis: Yes, industry funding has been received to support research at local area teaching hospitals to substitute for decreased availability of NIH funds. To test the hypothesis, Federal and local hospital fiscal data were extracted and statistical analysis was performed in three key areas to challenge the hypothesis and eliminate confounding data. First, is National Institutes of Health funding decreasing in real terms? Second, have local area teaching hospitals compensated by soliciting and receiving greater levels of industry sponsored research dollars? Third, has industry increased support in light of decreased NIH funding or are industry research commitments uncorrelated? The test questions were evaluated across two different hospitals and against various economic benchmarks. The hypothesis was rejected. Decreased NIH research funding granted to local academic hospitals has not caused a corresponding increase in industry sponsored research funding. Given the structural difficulties of industry and academic hospital collaboration, this likely impacts the level of industry sponsored research funding. Unfortunately, upcoming long-term Federal fiscal austerity may severely curtail NIH budgets. Academic hospitals will either need to consider greater industry collaboration or reduce the size and scope of their research activities.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby John A. Truesdell, Jr.en_US
dc.format.extent51 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectHarvard University--MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology.en_US
dc.titleDoes decreased research funding from the National Institutes of Health to local academic hospitals cause an increase in industry sponsored research funding?en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentHarvard University--MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology
dc.identifier.oclc769909583en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record