Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorKenneth E. Kruckemeyer and Ralph A. Gakenheimer.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSwitkes, Frances, 1978-en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-04-26T18:46:44Z
dc.date.available2012-04-26T18:46:44Z
dc.date.copyright2003en_US
dc.date.issued2003en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/70363
dc.descriptionThesis (M.C.P. and S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning, 2003.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 169-173).en_US
dc.description.abstractPeople can arrive at a station using a variety of different transportation modes including walking, biking, taking a bus or driving. Each access mode interfaces with transit in a different way. The layout and design of the station area affect how people reach the station and may attract or dissuade riders from using specific access modes or even whether to take transit at all. Improving transit accessibility benefits those people currently using transit and also makes it more attractive to people who may currently choose another mode for travel by providing another attractive mode choice, helping improve transit ridership and customer satisfaction. Different features and design elements that affect the safety, security, directness, weather protection and other supportive details of accessing transit are evaluated in this thesis. These elements extend from the station into the surrounding community. Since the transit agency does not control much of this infrastructure, it must work with other agencies to make these improvements. A suggested framework is developed to provide guidance at how a transit agency can effectively prioritize different station area improvements and how they can work with other agencies to efficiently implement these improvements. The number of people that will benefit and the potential for improvement should be considered when prioritizing projects. Projects that have lower priorities should be completed if there is an opportunity to incorporate them into other projects being done either by the transit agency or another agency. Design cases have been completed for Roosevelt Station in San Juan, Puerto Rico and Jefferson Park Station in Chicago, Illinois. Improving the pedestrian environment, including developing continuous, well-maintained sidewalks, is the most pressing need at Roosevelt Station. Jefferson Park needs to focus on the conflicts between modes created by the current design such as discouraging pedestrians from walking through the bus area, creating a pedestrian crossing in front of the station and improving dropoff access. Working with other agencies is important for both transit agencies.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Frances Switkes.en_US
dc.format.extent186 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectUrban Studies and Planning.en_US
dc.titleGetting there is half the problem : removing obstacles to accessing rail transiten_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeM.C.P.and S.M.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planning
dc.identifier.oclc52549859en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record