dc.contributor.advisor | Marilyne Andersen and Leon Glicksman. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Dave, Shreya H | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Mechanical Engineering. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-04-26T18:51:25Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-04-26T18:51:25Z | |
dc.date.copyright | 2012 | en_US |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/70416 | |
dc.description | Thesis (S.M. in Technology and Policy)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Engineering Systems Division, Technology and Policy Program; and, (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, 2012. | en_US |
dc.description | Cataloged from PDF version of thesis. | en_US |
dc.description | Includes bibliographical references (p. 143-148). | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Buildings account for over 40% of the energy consumption in the United States, nearly 40% of which is attributed to lighting. The selection of a fenestration system for a building is a critical decision as it offsets electric lighting use as well as impacts energy performance through heating and cooling systems. Further, the fenestration system contributes to both occupant comfort and ambiance of the space. Complex Fenestration Systems (CFS) address these factors with a variety of innovative technologies but the language to describe, discuss, and compare them does not exist. Existing traditional metrics for fenestration systems are unable to reveal the benefits that characterize complex fenestration systems because they are rigid, do not reflect annual performance, and were developed for a different purpose. The framework presented in this research offers a solution to this problem by using an annual climate-based methodology to provide a comprehensive evaluation of a system by incorporating three of the most relevant performance aspects: energy efficiency, occupant visual comfort, and ability to view through. Three metrics, the Relative Energy Impact (REI), the Extent of Comfortable Daylight (ECD), and the View Through Potential (VTP), were derived from these three criteria to express, in relative terms, a fagade's contribution to building energy use, comfortable daylight conditions, and the degree of transparency, respectively. Several practical matters were considered when developing a policy-relevant set of metrics, including both ease of calculation for manufacturers and usability for consumers. As such, the calculation methodology evolved from its initial proposal into a simplified approach, analytical where possible, and into a label-like concept for visual representation. These metrics are intended to exist as a mechanism by which manufacturers can evaluate and compare facade systems, provide high-level intuition of relative performance for designers and contractors, and enable the balance of performance objectives based on user preference. Ultimately, the creation of this comprehensive language is intended to stimulate innovation in fenestration systems and encourage their use in both new and retrofit building applications. | en_US |
dc.description.statementofresponsibility | by Shreya H. Dave. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 148 p. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | en_US |
dc.rights | M.I.T. theses are protected by
copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but
reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written
permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission. | en_US |
dc.rights.uri | http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582 | en_US |
dc.subject | Engineering Systems Division. | en_US |
dc.subject | Technology and Policy Program. | en_US |
dc.subject | Mechanical Engineering. | en_US |
dc.title | Comprehensive performance metrics for Complex Fenestration Systems using a relative approach | en_US |
dc.title.alternative | Comprehensive performance metrics for CFS using a relative approach | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dc.description.degree | S.M. | en_US |
dc.description.degree | S.M.in Technology and Policy | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering | |
dc.contributor.department | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering Systems Division | |
dc.identifier.oclc | 785146257 | en_US |