Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorW. Tod McGrath.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWalpole, Julie D., 1966-en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-05-15T21:09:04Z
dc.date.available2012-05-15T21:09:04Z
dc.date.copyright1998en_US
dc.date.issued1998en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/70747
dc.descriptionThesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning, 1998.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references.en_US
dc.description.abstractReal Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) were established in 1960 by Congress to open real estate investing to the small investor, in the same way that mutual funds have allowed small investors access to a diversified portfolio of stocks. As is the case with mutual funds, REITs enjoy a conduit status, allowing them to avoid corporate level taxation as long as they meet certain requirements. These requirements have been designed and legislated to ensure that REITs remains passive owners of real estate. As a passive owner of real estate, the traditional REIT vehicle is not ideally suited for an operationally intensive business, even those with a large real estate component (notably hotels, casinos, health care centers, and parking garages). Accordingly, variations of the REIT structure have emerged over time in an effort to benefit from the active business income generated through the operations of real estate holdings. One such variation is the Paired Share REIT. Conceived in 1977, and later banned from further formation in 1984, the structure has once again come under fire. Citing tax avoidance business practices that result in unfair competitive advantage, the Clinton Administration proposes to curb the use of the Paired Share structure on any new acquisitions by the five grandfathered Paired Share REITs that today still exist today. This thesis examines the Paired Share REIT structure and its perceived tax advantage. It concludes that while the Paired Share REIT structure can enjoy a tax advantage relative to a subchapter "C" corporation legislated REIT restrictions limit its financial flexibility. In addition, there are financial tactics available to the "C" corporation that can do much to mitigate these advantages. Two notable tactics are the use of the tax-shielding value of debt and the ability to retain earnings to fund growth. Further, it is concluded that the combined tax expense of the business entity and its shareholders does not differ significantly from the Paired Share REIT and the "C" corporation.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Julie D. Walpole.en_US
dc.format.extent99 leavesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectUrban Studies and Planning.en_US
dc.titleExploring the paired share REIT and quantifying its tax advantageen_US
dc.title.alternativeExploring the paired share real estate investment trust and quantifying its tax advantageen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planning
dc.identifier.oclc52034383en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record