Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHolton, Richard
dc.date.accessioned2012-07-23T20:59:03Z
dc.date.available2012-07-23T20:59:03Z
dc.date.issued2010-04
dc.identifier.issn0031-8116
dc.identifier.issn1573-0883
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/71769
dc.description.abstractRalph Wedgwood has written a big book: not in terms of pages (though there are plenty) but in terms of scope and ambition. Scope, in that he addresses many of the central issues around normativity, providing an account of the semantics of ‘ought’, and then a metaphysics and an epistemology to go with it; ambition in that so much of this is novel. Along the way there are myriad discussion of relevant philosophical background issues and of methodology.en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherSpringer-Verlagen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11098-010-9550-zen_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/en_US
dc.sourceMIT web domainen_US
dc.titleComments on Ralph Wedgwood's The Nature of Normativityen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationHolton, Richard. “Comments on Ralph Wedgwood’s The Nature of Normativity.” Philosophical Studies 151.3 (2010): 449–457. Web.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophyen_US
dc.contributor.approverHolton, Richard
dc.contributor.mitauthorHolton, Richard
dc.relation.journalPhilosophical Studiesen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsHolton, Richarden
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8116-2639
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICYen_US
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record