MIT Libraries logoDSpace@MIT

MIT
View Item 
  • DSpace@MIT Home
  • Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab (CSAIL)
  • Artificial Intelligence Lab Publications
  • AI Memos (1959 - 2004)
  • View Item
  • DSpace@MIT Home
  • Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab (CSAIL)
  • Artificial Intelligence Lab Publications
  • AI Memos (1959 - 2004)
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Investigating shape representation in area V4 with HMAX: Orientation and Grating selectivities

Author(s)
Kouh, Minjoon; Riesenhuber, Maximilian
Thumbnail
DownloadAIM-2003-021.ps (2.673Mb)
Additional downloads
AIM-2003-021.pdf (1.177Mb)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
The question of how shape is represented is of central interest to understanding visual processing in cortex. While tuning properties of the cells in early part of the ventral visual stream, thought to be responsible for object recognition in the primate, are comparatively well understood, several different theories have been proposed regarding tuning in higher visual areas, such as V4. We used the model of object recognition in cortex presented by Riesenhuber and Poggio (1999), where more complex shape tuning in higher layers is the result of combining afferent inputs tuned to simpler features, and compared the tuning properties of model units in intermediate layers to those of V4 neurons from the literature. In particular, we investigated the issue of shape representation in visual area V1 and V4 using oriented bars and various types of gratings (polar, hyperbolic, and Cartesian), as used in several physiology experiments. Our computational model was able to reproduce several physiological findings, such as the broadening distribution of the orientation bandwidths and the emergence of a bias toward non-Cartesian stimuli. Interestingly, the simulation results suggest that some V4 neurons receive input from afferents with spatially separated receptive fields, leading to experimentally testable predictions. However, the simulations also show that the stimulus set of Cartesian and non-Cartesian gratings is not sufficiently complex to probe shape tuning in higher areas, necessitating the use of more complex stimulus sets.
Date issued
2003-09-08
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/7278
Other identifiers
AIM-2003-021
CBCL-231
Series/Report no.
AIM-2003-021CBCL-231
Keywords
AI, Shape Tuning, Shape Representation, Features, HMAX, Visual Cortex, Gratings, V4

Collections
  • AI Memos (1959 - 2004)
  • CBCL Memos (1993 - 2004)

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

Login

Statistics

OA StatisticsStatistics by CountryStatistics by Department
MIT Libraries
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
MIT
Content created by the MIT Libraries, CC BY-NC unless otherwise noted. Notify us about copyright concerns.