Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorJohn Van Maanen.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKurtz, Kristel (Kristel Edith Elaine)en_US
dc.contributor.otherSloan School of Management.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-13T18:59:44Z
dc.date.available2012-09-13T18:59:44Z
dc.date.copyright2012en_US
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/72890
dc.descriptionThesis (M.B.A.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, 2012.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 39).en_US
dc.description.abstractFor people of equal aptitude and accomplishment, differences in career progression to the senior ranks of a professional services firm are often attributed to the presence or absence of sponsorship from senior executives. Senior advocates play a critical role in career advancement by identifying opportunities and by giving proteges the chance to compete for those opportunities. My hypothesis is that people who desire advancement need a clear sponsor within an organization in order to plan a path forward and to bring visibility to their past accomplishments and their future potential. The hypothesis was evaluated in the consulting industry. The basis for the research was a combination of field study interviews and an experimental survey. The field study involved interviewing Senior Executives in the consulting industry who have chosen to make a long-term career in the industry and those who have moved onto other industries. Vignettes of the interviewee's description of their career progression were developed and survey tested with mid-career executives. The survey participants rated the competency, level of sponsorship, and promotion readiness of the candidate. Varying the candidate's gender across the surveys also tested the effect of gender on promotion rating. From the survey results, competency was the most significant predictor of promotion with female gender having a negative, but smaller, yet still statistically significant effect. Sponsorship did not have a statistically significant effect on promotion within the survey study. However, sponsorship was identified in addition to competence and opportunity as a key factor to interviewee's success. This difference in sponsorship indicates discontinuity between described practice and observed interpretation.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Kristel Kurtz.en_US
dc.format.extent50 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectSloan School of Management.en_US
dc.titleSponsorship and career progression in the consulting industryen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeM.B.A.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentSloan School of Management
dc.identifier.oclc808384017en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record