Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorErnst R. Berndt.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCopp, Joshuaen_US
dc.contributor.otherSloan School of Management.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-13T19:01:13Z
dc.date.available2012-09-13T19:01:13Z
dc.date.copyright2012en_US
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/72907
dc.descriptionThesis (M.B.A.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, 2012.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 69-81).en_US
dc.description.abstractHistorically, the development of molecular companion diagnostics in oncology has underwhelmed the expectation of the medical field since the successful mapping of the human genome a decade ago. There have been several highly successful developments (Her2-neu, Genomic Health, etc.), but not the widespread revolution in clinical practice expected at the turn of the century. The primary goal of this document is to investigate the economics driving molecular diagnostics and its relationship with strategic decisions in developing a diagnostic technology. The document begins with a broad analysis of the funding environment for molecular and esoteric diagnostics in oncology. Following a discussion of funding sources and current trends, the second section reviews the nature of the projects that funding supports. This is accomplished through a set of detailed case studies of Genomic Health and Immunicon to compare and contrast the strategic decisions that led to value creation events for both companies. Finally, the third section abstracts away from specific cases to develop a strategic analytic framework for evaluating the potential risk-adjusted NPV for a new diagnostic technology. Sensitivity analyses are conducted in addition to a discussion of current events that may change the structure of the underlying decision tree. The conclusion revisits the topics discussed in the first three sections, connecting the implications of funding on different strategic decisions and chances of success. Areas for further investigation both for inputs to the current model proposed, as well as for more refined versions of the development model are discussed.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Joshua Copp.en_US
dc.format.extent103 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectSloan School of Management.en_US
dc.titleBridging the "Valley of Death" in stratified medicine : commercializing molecular diagnostics in oncologyen_US
dc.title.alternativeCommercializing molecular diagnostics in oncologyen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeM.B.A.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentSloan School of Management
dc.identifier.oclc809045007en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record